What if every decision made by those who govern the lives of others was a reflection of their understanding of what governs their own? What if everyone responsible for creating political policy and infrastructure asked the question: What would nature do? What if they implemented the sciences of anthropology, ecology, and biomimicry as a means of formulating a sustainable society? What if they strove to understand what makes an ant or bumblebee colony thrive — and what causes it to collapse? Imagine if, as a society at large, we all acknowledged the significance of leveraging every scientific breakthrough made by humanity and comprehended the genuine anthropological requirements. Moreover, envision a scenario where our awareness of the fundamental human needs shielded us from succumbing to the impact of cultural conflicts.
The Eco Directive is an objective approach to addressing human problems through observation and implementation of free R&D. Mother Nature is the only honorable system of governance worthy of universal acceptance. She is an unbiased logic to be recognized and trusted by all regardless of class, race, tribe, or nation. She is an intelligence which has spent the last 3.8 billion years creating order out of chaos with no other agenda than to create, sustain, and evolve life. She has on display countless examples of successful design solutions to be utilized by those who recognize they themselves are products of the same wisdom. Those who follow her logic also understand that a government with disregard for her decentralized intellectual property will limit their intellectual capacity to govern the lives of others—and will ultimately endanger the global ecosystem in its entirety.
The Eco Directive is not for the procurement of monetary compensation, but the promotion of the universal currency of trust—a commodity eternally honorable and fungible, and far more valuable than any product changing hands. In a time of great political divide, we may argue about who is trustworthy, but there is one thing we can all agree on—a system that divides us through an inequitable and unsustainable use of resources clearly isn’t working. It is time to pivot to a model which better serves our collective needs and ensures our continued evolution.
We, like all products of Earth ecology, have a birthright to participate and contribute to the evolution of our species within the ecosystem of our home planet. We also have a responsibility to leave this world intact for future generations, as well as a guide for its stewardship. Unfortunately, the intuition embedded within our genetic code has been overridden by a cultural narrative which has promoted entitlement and greed. As a result, we are now living through the sixth mass-extinction, with no plan to avoid absolution. We will continue on this downward trajectory until we acknowledge the hubris within the artificial systems of anthropocentric corporate industry and demand a society which honors the directive of ecology to restore equity for all life.
The concept of what is most beneficial for humanity has been shaped by a small group of individuals within our species. The promotion of colonialism and the belief in cultural superiority have diminished the use of sustainable practices. Prioritizing materialism and mass production has elevated GDP above human welfare, leading to a global ecological crisis. To shift direction, it is essential to challenge those in power who encourage adherence to a failing system through cultural and religious divisions. Politicians influenced by corporate funding, tied to corporate agendas, often divert attention by focusing on irrelevant cultural matters. True self-worth should come from community contributions and personal interactions, not from material possessions like cars, homes, and bank accounts, which are falsely portrayed as threatened by opposing factions.
The relevance of capitalism may be debated, but its cyclical nature is undeniable. In its current late stage, capitalism is controlled by corporations with government support, making it nearly impossible for even the most ethical politicians to enact policies against corporate interests. Therefore, it falls upon us as citizens to gather individuals with the necessary expertise to devise viable alternatives. We must present these options transparently, despite facing misinformation aimed at discrediting any changes that would impact corporate profits.
It is time to contemplate the kind of society we might have embraced if we had been presented with ecologically sustainable options for communities and infrastructure instead of the current consumer-driven, growth-oriented model. Would a system focused on communal dedication and sharing rather than individual competition for material wealth have been more appealing? Acknowledging that a competitive system inevitably results in wealth concentration at the top, to the detriment of others and the environment, wouldn't we have preferred a more equitable structure? Had we foreseen the negative impacts of car ownership on our lifestyles, housing, and environment, might we have opted for a different infrastructure? It is time to hold accountable those responsible for the irresponsible use of energy and resources. We must collectively see through their diversion tactics and realize that they pose an existential threat, not the opposing political party, and demand that they fund the research and development of sustainable alternatives.
As followers of the Eco Directive, we hereby state the following:
We believe that during the onset of the Industrial Revolution, we should have had the opportunity to pursue a sustainable model for humanity. However, this chance was denied to us by the "titans of industry" who prioritized growth at any cost over establishing a fair and ecologically responsible society. The infrastructure we rely on today was predominantly shaped by the automotive and fossil fuel industries, without proper consideration for societal and ecological well-being. While we acknowledge the utility of automobiles for inter-village travel, we assert that they serve no purpose in the daily life of a functional community. We advocate for the profits generated by these industries to be channeled towards the development of environmentally responsible environments and infrastructure that benefit all life, rather than perpetuating inefficient and harmful systems for their own gain. We consider this a rational and just solution to address both the housing crisis and climate emergency.
We firmly believe that connection with nature is an inherent human right essential to our well-being. Human habitats should offer a rich sensory experience through the integration of natural elements and ecosystems. The capitalist system has led to the consolidation of services by corporations, diminishing our bond with nature and eroding opportunities for self-sustaining communities and self-governance. Our detachment from natural rewards has fostered a reliance on consumer goods at the expense of our physical and mental health. We advocate for community-led development free from corporate influence as a means to restore this balance.
Humanity requires a model that champions sustainability, equality, ecological responsibility, and self-sufficiency. The society that achieves sustainability and contentment without exploiting others will be hailed as the pinnacle of human achievement. We believe that the United States, as a major global power with a significant carbon footprint and budget, bears a moral duty to spearhead this endeavor. Sustainable self-reliance not only sets a commendable example but also reduces animosity and the need for military interventions in exploited regions, thus beginning to heal the intergenerational trauma inflicted in the name of progress through military might. Embracing the Eco Directive signifies our recognition of our interconnectedness with all life on Earth. Failure to pursue these objectives may lead to societal collapse due to ecological disasters or nuclear conflicts.
We reject the notion of an "us-against-them" mentality and refuse to justify our participation in the current capitalist system on grounds of entitlement. We commit to minimizing our resource consumption within this framework as we strive for change. We assert that "personal rights" lose their validity if they harm or exploit other forms of life, regardless of race or species. We vehemently oppose any claims of supremacy based on race or culture. We only acknowledge governmental authority that actively works towards sustainability through ecological wisdom.
We pledge to reduce our reliance on products derived from the exploitation of marginalized communities while promoting the localization of jobs and services. We aim to support colonized cultures in reclaiming their traditional practices, drawing on their deep-rooted ecological knowledge and respecting the limits of their regional ecosystems. We aspire to serve as a conduit for sharing sustainable practices advocated by the Eco Directive among diverse cultures.
Anthropolis invites collaboration from artists, designers, filmmakers, and all media creators to join forces in promoting convivial and sustainable societal models. This is a call for unity with movements that share the vision of fostering hope and motivation to reshape society into a source of pride through sustainability, rather than allowing it to spiral into shame and decay.
What would nature do?
May this be the mantra for the Ecological Revolution.
Comments